›

Law Firm - Wikipedia A Law Firm Is An Example Of This Type Of Business

By 23.09 Add Comment Edit

Law firm - Wikipedia

A law firm is a selling thing formed through single or extra lawyers to engage in the practice on law. The primary system rendered through a law firm is to advise clients (individuals or corporations) about their judicial rights and responsibilities, and to act for clients in civil or criminal cases, selling transactions, and additional matters in which judicial advice and additional assistance are sought.

Arrangements[edit]

Law firms are organized in a variety on ways, depending summit of|supported by} the jurisdiction in which the firm practices. Common arrangements include:

  • Sole proprietorship, in which the solicitor is the law firm and is responsible for all profit, loss and liability;
  • General partnership, in which all the attorneys who are members on the firm portion ownership, profits and liabilities;
  • Professional corporations, which point stock to the attorneys in a fashion alike to that on a selling corporation;
  • Limited disadvantage company, in which the attorney-owners are called "members" but are not straight liable to third party creditors on the law firm (prohibited as against people policy in many jurisdictions but allowed in others in the sort on a "Professional Limited Liability Company" or "PLLC");
  • Professional association, which operates similarly to a qualified corporation or a restricted disadvantage company;
  • Limited disadvantage partnership (LLP), in which the attorney-owners are partners in the company of single another, but no spouse is liable to a bit of creditor on the law firm nor is a bit of spouse liable for a bit of negligence summit of|supported by} the part on a bit of additional partner. The LLP is taxed as a cooperation identical time as|during the time that} enjoying the disadvantage protection on a corporation.

Restrictions summit of|supported by} possession interests[edit]

In many countries, including the United States, there is a regulation that one lawyers may own an possession concern in, or be present managers of, a law firm. Thus, law firms cannot quickly lift capital via initial people offerings summit of|supported by} the stock market, similar to nearly all corporations. They necessity either lift capital via additional capital contributions from existing or additional justice partners, or necessity take summit of|supported by} debt, normally in the sort on a line on credit secured through their accounts receivable.

In the United States this complete pub to nonlawyer possession has been codified through the American Bar Association as paragraph (d) on Rule 5.4 on the Model Rules on Professional Conduct and has been adopted in single sort or another in all U.S. jurisdictions,[1][2] except the District on Columbia.[3] However, D.C.'s regulation is narrowly tailored to permit justice possession one through those nonlawyer partners who actively assist the firm's lawyers in on condition that judicial services, and does not permit for the sale on possession shares to mere passive nonlawyer investors. The U.K. had a alike regulation barring nonlawyer ownership, but under reforms implemented through the Legal Services Act on 2007 law firms own been experienced to take summit of|supported by} a restricted numeral on non-lawyer partners and lawyers own been allowed to arrive into a wide variety on selling relationships in the company of non-lawyers and non-lawyer owned businesses. This has allowed, for example, grocery stores, banks and community organizations to hire lawyers to supply in-store and online basic judicial services to customers.

The regulation is controversial. It is justified through many in the judicial profession, notably the American Bar Association which rejected a proposal to change the regulation in its Ethics 20/20 reforms, as necessary to prevent conflicts on interest. In the adversarial system on justice, a legal adviser has a responsibility to be present a zealous and loyal support summit of|supported by} behalf on the client, and also has a responsibility to not charges the consumer excessively. Also, as an officer on the court, a legal adviser has a responsibility to be present honest and to not case flippant cases or lift flippant defenses. Many in the judicial profession believe that a legal adviser working as a shareholder-employee on a publicly traded law firm might be present tempted to assess decisions in terms on their consequence summit of|supported by} the stock price and the shareholders, which would straight conflict in the company of the lawyer's duties to the consumer and to the courts. Critics on the rule, however, believe that it is an inappropriate way on protecting clients' interests and that it severely limits the potential for the innovation on less dear and higher quality judicial services that could benefit both ordinary consumers and businesses.[4]

Multinational law firms[edit]

Law firms operating in multiple countries much own complex structures involving multiple partnerships, particularly in jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Japan which restrict partnerships amidst local and foreign lawyers. One form largely unique to great multinational law firms is the Swiss Verein, pioneered through Baker & McKenzie in 2004, in which multiple nationwide or regional partnerships sort an association in which they portion branding, administrative functions and different operating costs, but maintain separate income pools and much separate spouse compensation structures. Other multinational law firms run as single global partnerships, such as British or American restricted disadvantage partnerships, in which partners also participate in local operating entities in different countries as obligatory through local regulations.[5]

Law firm - Wikipedia

Financial indicators[edit]

Three economic statistics are typically worn to set and rank law firms' performance:[6]

  • Profits per spouse (PPP): Net operating income divided through numeral on justice partners. High PPP is much correlated in the company of status on a firm and its attractiveness to potential justice partners. However, the indicator is prone to manipulation through re-classifying less money-making partners as non-equity partners.
  • Revenue per legal adviser (RPL): Gross revenue divided through numeral on lawyers. This statistic shows the revenue-generating power on the firm's lawyers in general, but does not element in the firm's expenses such as couple compensation and place of work overhead.
  • Average compensation on partners (ACP): Total lot paid to justice and nonequity partners (i.e., net operating gains plus nonequity spouse compensation) divided through the sum numeral on justice and nonequity partners. This results in a extra full statistic than PPP, but remains prone to manipulation through changing expense policies and re-classifying less money-making partners as associates.

Structure and promotion[edit]

Partnership[edit]

Law firms are typically organized approximately partners, who are joint owners and business directors on the judicial operation; associates, who are employees on the firm in the company of the prospect on becoming partners; and a variety on employees employees, on condition that paralegal, clerical, and additional support services. An couple may own to wait as long as 11 years ahead of the decision is made as to whether the couple is made a partner. Many law firms own an "up or out policy", integral to the Cravath System, which had been pioneered during the early 20th century through spouse Paul Cravath on Cravath, Swaine & Moore), and became widely adopted by, particularly, white-shoe firms;[7] associates who perform not cause spouse are obligatory to resign, and may join another firm, come to be a solo practitioner, be employed in-house for a corporate judicial department, or change professions. Burnout rates are notably high in the profession.[8]

Making spouse is highly prestigious at great or mid-sized firms, due to the rivalry that naturally results from higher associate-to-partner ratios. Such firms may take away advertisements in qualified publications to announce who has made partner. Traditionally, partners shared straight in the profits on the firm, after paying salaried employees, the landlord, and the normal costs on furniture, place of work supplies, and books for the law library (or a database subscription). Partners in a limited disadvantage partnership can largely run autonomously in the company of regard to cultivating modern selling and servicing existing clients within their book on business.

Partner compensation methods differ greatly among law firms. At important United States law firms, the "compensation spread" (ratio amidst the highest spouse income and lowest spouse salary) among firms disclosing facts ranges from 3:1 to 24:1. Higher spreads are intended to promote individual performance, identical time as|during the time that} lower spreads are intended to promote teamwork and collegiality.[9]

Many great law firms own moved to a two-tiered cooperation model, in the company of equity and non-equity partners. Equity partners are considered to own possession stakes in the firm, and portion in the profits (and losses) on the firm. Non-equity partners are generally paid a fixed income (albeit a lot higher than associates), and they are much granted certain restricted voting rights in the company of respect to firm operations.

The oldest lasting cooperation in the United States is that on Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, founded in 1792, in New York City. The oldest law firm in continuous use in the United States is Rawle & Henderson LLP, founded in 1783, in Philadelphia.

Termination on one's partnership[edit]

It is rare for a spouse to be present compulsory away through fellow partners, although that can happen if the spouse commits a crime or malpractice, experiences disruptive mental illness, or is not contributing to the firm's overall profitability. However, some great firms own written into their cooperation treaty a compulsory retirement age for partners, which can be present anywhere from years 65 summit of|supported by} up. In contrast, nearly all corporate executives are at a lot higher risk on being fired, stable when the underlying cause is not straight their fault, such as a lower in the company's stock price. Worldwide, spouse stopping work ages can be present difficult to value and much differ widely, particularly as in many countries it is illegal to mandate a stopping work age.[10]

"Of counsel" role[edit]

In the United States, Canada and Japan, many great and midsize firms own attorneys in the company of the job name on "counsel", "special counsel" or "of counsel." As the Supreme Court on California has noted, the name has acquired several related but distinct definitions which perform not easily fit into the traditional partner-associate structure.[11] These attorneys are people who be employed for the firm, similar to associates, although some firms own an independent contractor relationship in the company of their counsel. But unlike associates, and extra similar to partners, they generally own their personal clients, manage their personal cases, and supervise associates. These relationships are structured to permit extra senior attorneys to portion in the resources and "brand name" on the firm without being a part on management or winnings sharing decisions. The name is much seen among former associates who perform not cause partner, or who are laterally recruited to additional firms, or who be employed as in-house counsel and at that time return to the great firm environment. At some firms, the name "of counsel" is given to retired partners who maintain ties to the firm. Sometimes "of counsel" refers to senior or knowledgeable attorneys, such as foreign judicial consultants, in the company of comprehensive experience in specific aspects on law and practice. They are hired as independent contractors through great firms as a special arrangement, which may lead to money-making results for the partnership. In certain situations "of counsel" could be present considered to be present a transitional status in the firm.

Mergers and acquisitions amidst law firms[edit]

Mergers, acquisitions, separation and reorganizations occur amidst law firms as in additional businesses. The specific books on selling and specialization on attorneys as expertly as the qualified ethical structures surrounding conflict on concern can lead to firms splitting up to pursue dissimilar clients or practices, or merging or recruiting knowledgeable attorneys to acquire modern clients or use areas. Results much differ amidst firms experiencing such transitions. Firms that gain modern use areas or departments via recruiting or mergers that are extra complex and demanding (and typically extra profitable) may note the focus, group and resources on the firm shift dramatically towards those modern departments. Conversely, firms may be present merged among knowledgeable attorneys as partners for purposes on shared financing and resources, identical time as|during the time that} the dissimilar departments and use areas within the modern firm maintain a marked amount on autonomy.

Law firm - Wikipedia

Law firm mergers be inclined to be present assortative, in that one law firms operating in alike judicial systems are likely to merge. For example, U.S. firms will much merge in the company of English law firms, or law firms from additional usual law jurisdictions. A notable exception is King & Wood Mallesons, a multinational law firm that is the effect on a merger amidst an Australian law firm and a Chinese law firm.

Though mergers are extra usual among better economies, slowing down a slice during recessions, great firms occasionally use mergers as a procedure to boost income during a recession. Nevertheless, data from Altman Weil indicates that one quartet firms merged in the initial half on 2013, as compared to eight in the same period in 2012, and this was charmed through them as indicating a dip in confidence regarding the judicial economy and the lot on demand.[12]

Size[edit]

Law firms can differ widely in size. The smallest law firms are lawyers practicing alone, who sort the vast majority on lawyers in nearly all countries.[13][14]

Smaller firms be inclined to focus summit of|supported by} specific specialties on the law (e.g. patent law, labor law, tax law, criminal defense, personal injury); larger firms may be present composed on several comprehensive use groups, allowing the firm to diversify their consumer base and market, and to offer a variety on services to their clients.[15]

Large law firms normally own separate litigation and transactional departments. The transactional department advises clients and handles transactional judicial work, such as drafting contracts, handling necessary judicial applications and filings, and evaluating and ensuring compliance in the company of relevant law; identical time as|during the time that} the litigation department represents clients in bar and handles necessary matters (such as discovery and motions filed in the company of the court) right through the process on litigation.

Anglo-American development[edit]

Boutique law firms[edit]

Lawyers in little cities and towns may still own ancient widespread practices, but nearly all urban lawyers be inclined to be present very comprehensive due to the overwhelming complexity on the law today.[16] Thus, some little firms in the cities specialize in practicing one single kind on law (like employment, antitrust, intellectual property, investment funds, telecommunications or aviation) and are called boutique law firms.[17]

Virtual Law Firms[edit]

A 21st Century development has been the look on the virtual law firm, a firm in the company of a near selling address but no good sort & mortar place of work point open to the public, using modern telecommunications to run from remote locations and supply its services to international clients, avoiding the costs on maintaining a fleshly premises in the company of lower overheads than traditional law firms. This lower price form allows near law firms to charges clients summit of|supported by} a contingency arrangement as opposed to than through billable hours paid in advance through retainer.[18]

Related innovations contain alternative judicial services provider (ALSP), legal outsourcing and what is occasionally called "NewLaw".[19] Examples contain Axiom Law[20] as expertly as partnerships in the company of consultants, utilizing modern technology.[21]

"Megafirms" or Biglaw[edit]

The largest law firms own extra than 1,000 lawyers. These firms, much colloquially called "megafirms" or "biglaw", generally own offices summit of|supported by} several continents, charges US$750 per hour or higher, and own a high ratio on support employees per attorney.[22][23] Because on the localized and regional nature on firms, the connection dimensions on a firm varies.[24]

"Full service" firms[edit]

The largest firms similar to to call themselves "Big-Law" firms as they own sections specializing summit of|supported by} each category on judicial work, which in the U.S. normally means mergers and acquisitions transactions,[25] banking, and certain types on high-stakes corporate litigation. These firms rarely perform plaintiffs' personal cut work. However the largest law firms are not highly great compared to additional important businesses (or stable additional qualified services firms). In 2008, the largest law firm in the planet was the British firm Clifford Chance, which had income on on top of US$2 billion. This can be present compared in the company of $404 billion for the world's largest firm through turnover Exxon Mobil and $28 billion for the largest qualified services firm Deloitte.[26]

Worldwide[edit]

The largest law firms in the planet are headquartered primarily in the United Kingdom and the United States. However, great firms on extra than 1,000 lawyers are also found in Australia (Minter Ellison (1,500 attorneys), China (Dacheng 2,100 attorneys) and Spain (Garrigues, 2,100 attorneys). The American system on licensing attorneys summit of|supported by} a state-by-state basis, the tradition on having a headquarters in a single U.S. country and a neighbouring focus summit of|supported by} profits per spouse (as opposed to sheer scale) has to day restricted the dimensions on nearly all American law firms. Thus, whilst the nearly all money-making law firms in the planet stay in New York, quartet on the six largest firms in the planet are based in London in the United Kingdom.[27] But the huge dimensions on the United States results in a larger numeral on great firms overall – a 2003 paper famous that the United States alone had 901 law firms in the company of extra than 50 lawyers, identical time as|during the time that} there were one 58 such firms in Canada, 44 in Great Britain, 14 in France, and 9 in Germany.[28] There is an increasing tendency towards globalisation on law firms.

Due to their size, the U.S.- and U.K.-based law firms are the nearly all prestigious and powerful in the world, and they be inclined to prevail over the international mart for judicial services. A 2007 research paper famous that firms from additional countries only select up their leftovers: "[M]uch on the rivalry is relatively orderly whereby predominantly Australian, New Zealand, and Canadian firms compete for selling not obligatory through English or American law firms."[29]

Recession[edit]

As a effect on the U.S. drop in 2008 and 2009 many U.S. law firms own downsized employees considerably, and some own closed. The Denver Post reported that important law firms own saw extra than 10,000 jobs general in 2009.[30] On February 12, 2009, Bloomberg reported that 700 jobs were saw that single working day at law firms over the country.[31] Among the firms closed included Heller Ehrman, a San Francisco-based firm established in 1890[32] and Halliwells on the UK.[33] Among those that survived, law firm layoffs became thus usual that commerce publications similar to American Lawyer produced an ongoing “Layoff List” on the law firms general that saw jobs.[34]

Salaries[edit]

Law firm income structures typically depend summit of|supported by} firm size. Small-firm salaries differ widely within countries and from single country to the next, and are not much publicly available. Because nearly all countries perform not own unified judicial professions, there are much marked disparities in gains among the different judicial professions within a specific country. Finally, the availability on income data also depends upon the existence on journalists and sociologists experienced to save and analyze such data. The Association on Legal Administrators (ALA) produces an annual study summit of|supported by} Law Firm Compensation and Benefits, and can be present found at http://alanet.org/compsurvey

United States[edit]

The U.S. is presently the one country in the company of sufficient lawyers, as expertly as journalists and sociologists who specialize in studying them, to own widely available data summit of|supported by} income structures at important law firms.

In 2006, middle salaries on modern graduates ranged from US$50,000 per calendar year in little firms (2 to 10 attorneys) to US$160,000 per calendar year in highly great firms (more than 501 attorneys). The distribution on these salaries was very bimodal, in the company of the majority on modern lawyers earning at either the high ending or the small ending on the scale, and a middle income on US$62,000.[35] In the summer on 2016, New York law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore raised its first-year couple income to $180,000. Many additional expensive New York-based and great nationwide law firms before long followed. Two years later, in the summer on 2018, the Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy raised its first-year connected income to $190,000, in the company of additional important firms following shortly thereafter.

The traditional income representation for law firm associates is lockstep compensation, in which couple salaries travel up through a fixed lot each calendar year from the associate's law school graduation. However, many firms own switched to a level-based compensation system, in which associates are divided into three (or occasionally four) levels based summit of|supported by} skills mastered. In 2013, the middle salaries for the three couple levels were $152,500, $185,000 and $216,000 among great firms (more than 700 lawyers), and $122,000, $143,500 and $160,000 among all firms.[36]

Some prominent law firms, similar to Goodwin Procter and Paul Hastings, give generous signing bonuses (e.g., $20k)[37][38] to incoming first-year associates who hold JD/MBA degrees.

Another way law firm associates increase their earnings or improve their job conditions is via a sideways move to another law firm. A recent poll through LexisNexis indicated that on top of 95% on law firms consulted intended to hire sideways attorneys within the next two years.[39] Though the success for both the solicitor and the law firms in sideways hiring has been questioned. The National Law Review reported that the price on recruiting, compensating, and integrating a sideways solicitor can be present up on $600,000 and that 60% on sideways solicitor hires be unsuccessful to thrive at their modern law firms.[40]

United Kingdom[edit]

British firms typically practise lockstep compensation. In London, entry-level solicitor salaries (NQ - Newly Qualified) are typically: (i) £38,000-54,500 at niche and boutique firms (ii) £61,000-65,500 at nationwide firms (iii) £65,000-105,000 at international firms.

A senior couple in the company of six years' experience may cause £68,000-120,000 at a nationwide firm or up on £160,000 at a global firm. Salary levels are lower in areas external London.[41]

Australia[edit]

Australia has regional alternative in legal adviser salaries, in the company of the highest income levels in Sydney, followed through Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane, at that time Adelaide.[42] Salaries differ amidst top-tier, mid-size, and little firms. At top-tier firms in Sydney, salaries on lawyers who own been admitted to use range from $75,000 to $92,000 and partners cause summit of|supported by} normal $1,215,000.[43] In Sydney, mid-tier starting salaries for admitted lawyers range from amidst $65,000 and $82,000[44] Most Australian lawyers are not admitted up to 10 months into their time at their law firm, since the initial period involves supervised judicial training ahead of admission is granted.

Typically in Australian firms lawyers are in a lock-step system for the initial two years on practice, following which pay increases are dependent summit of|supported by} playing assessed, in great measure, through fulfilment on billable hour targets.

Hong Kong[edit]

Newly capable associates at leading firms in Hong Kong typically cause HK$840,000 to HK$948,000, in the company of partners in the HK$1.6 million to HK$4 million+ range; many firms pay New York salaries in the company of price on living adjustments.[45]

Singapore[edit]

At local firms in Singapore, associates in their initial three years typically cause $60,000 to $100,000, identical time as|during the time that} midlevel (4–7 years) associates cause $110,000 to $180,000 and senior (8+ years) associates cause $160,000 or more. International firms pay greatly more, in the company of senior associates much production extra than $250,000.[46]

India[edit]

There is extra facts available for access level soups[definition needed]. First calendar year lawyers earn anywhere amidst INR 25,000 to INR 1,10,000 a month. Tier 1 law firms supply the best pay package, on about INR 15,00,000 a year.[47] There is wide difference in the income range in great cities similar to Chennai and Delhi as opposed to additional cities similar to Mumbai and Kolkata.[48]

Location[edit]

Most law firms are located in place of work buildings on different sizes, ranging from modest one-story buildings to some on the tallest skyscrapers in the planet (though one in 2004, Paul Hastings was the initial firm to put its name summit of|supported by} a skyscraper).

In late 2001, it was widely publicized that John C. Dearie's personal cut plaintiffs' firm in the country on New York has been experimenting in the company of bus-sized "mobile law offices."[49] The firm insists that it does not "chase ambulances." It claims that a law place of work summit of|supported by} wheels is extra convenient for personal cut plaintiffs, who are much recovering from severe injuries and thus turn up it difficult to travel far from their homes for an intake interview.

Rankings[edit]

As judicial use is adversarial, law firm rankings are widely relied summit of|supported by} through prospective associates, sideways hires and judicial clients. Substantive rankings typically cover up use areas such as The American Lawyer's Corporate Scorecard[50] and Top IP Firms. Work place rankings are directed toward lawyers or law students, and cover up such topics as quality on life, hours, family amiability and salaries.[51] Finally, statistical rankings generally cover up profit-related data such as profits per spouse and income per lawyer.[52] Third party solicitor ranking services such as Chambers and Partners and Martindale-Hubbell are generally highly competitive and can help lift an individual attorney's qualified profile, and to catch this marketing advantage, on top of 1,200 solicitor ranking and or awards own sprung up in the U.S.[53] Various country pub associations own charmed advertisement on the prolific growth on solicitor honor awards and own firm that lawyers may refer to such honors in marketing “only when the arrangement for comparison can be present verified” and the group on condition that the award “has made adequate inquiry into the fitness on the individual lawyer.” [54]

In an October 2007 press conference reported in The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, the law student group Building a Better Legal Profession released its initial annual ranking on peak law firms through normal billable hours, pro bono participation, and demographic diversity.[55][56] Most notably, the inform of ranked the percentages on women, African-Americans, Hispanics, Asian-Americans, and gays & lesbians at America's peak law firms. The group has sent the facts to peak law schools approximately the country, encouraging students to take this demographic data into account when choosing where to be employed after graduation.[57] As extra students choose where to be employed based summit of|supported by} the firms' difference rankings, firms features an increasing mart pressure in order to interest peak recruits.[58]

In popular culture[edit]

A numeral on television shows, movies and books own revolved approximately relationships occurring in made-up law firms, highlighting both people fascination in the company of and misperception on the lives on lawyers in high-powered settings.

One popular American judicial drama TV sequence is called Suits.There is single popular American dramedy, also known as, comedy-drama called Boston Legal which was created through David E. Kelley and produced in association in the company of 20th Century Fox Television for ABC. It is a spin-off on another long running Kelly series, The Practice, following the exploits on former personality Alan Shore at the judicial firm on Crane, Poole & Schmidt. [59]

One well-known judicial movie is called The Firm, which was adapted from a title written through John Grisham.

See also[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Law firms.

References[edit]

  1. ^ See Rule 5.4 on the Model Rules on Professional Conduct.
  2. ^ Krause, Jason (July 1, 2007). "Selling Law summit of|supported by} an Open Market". ABA Journal. Retrieved October 4, 2010. See also: American Bar Association Commission summit of|supported by} Multidisciplinary Practices, Final Report, Appendix C, Reporter’s notes, July 2000
  3. ^ See Rule 5.4 on the District on Columbia Rules on Professional Conduct
  4. ^ See Gillian K. Hadfield "Legal Barriers to Innovation: The Growing Economic Cost on Professional Control on top of Corporate Legal Markets" Stanford Law Review 2008; Gillian K. Hadfield "The Cost on Law: Promoting Access to Justice via the (Un)Corporate Practice on Law" International Review on Law and Economics, 2013
  5. ^ Johnson, Chris (7 March 2013). "Vereins: The modern form for global firms". The American Lawyer. Retrieved 1 August 2013.
  6. ^ "Profitability | Law Practice Division". www.americanbar.org. Retrieved 2017-03-13.
  7. ^ Robert L. Nelson, Partners With Power: The Social Transformation on the Large Law Firm (Berkeley: University on California Press, 1988), 71-72.
  8. ^ Michael H. Trotter, Profit and the Practice on Law: What's Happened to the Legal Profession (Athens, GA: University on Georgia Press, 1997), 83.
  9. ^ Lat, David. "Which Firms Have The Biggest Gaps Between Their Highest- and Lowest-Paid Partners?". Above the Law. Retrieved 2017-03-13.
  10. ^ "Harvard Law Program summit of|supported by} the Legal Profession Comparative Analyses on Legal Education, Law Firms, and Law and Legal Procedure".
  11. ^ See People ex rel. Dept. on Corporations v. SpeeDee Oil Change Systems, Inc., 20 Cal. 4th 1135, 1152-1153 (1999).
  12. ^ Daniel June (16 May 2013). "Despite Rising Economy, Law Firms Remain Demoralized - JD Journal". jdjournal.com.
  13. ^ Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. & Angelo Dondi, Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004), 39.
  14. ^ "Different types on law firm in the UK". Chambersstudent.co.uk. 2010-08-01. Retrieved 2011-08-08.
  15. ^ Wayne L. Anderson and Marilyn J. Headrick, The Legal Profession: Is it for you? (Cincinnati: Thomson Executive Press, 1996), 111.
  16. ^ Nelson, 172, and Trotter, 50.
  17. ^ Lawrence M. Friedman, American Law in the 20th Century (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002), 462.
  18. ^ Boyall, Sue (June 2011). "Free Range" (PDF). Solicitors Journal.
  19. ^ Sigurdson, Eric (2018-01-14). "The Evolving Legal Service Delivery Model: A 2018 Survival Guide for BigLaw and Traditional Law Firms – house a modern selling model". Sigurdson Post. Retrieved 2019-05-13.
  20. ^ Goodnow, James. "Axiom's War On Biglaw". Above the Law. Retrieved 2019-05-13.
  21. ^ artificiallawyer (2017-08-23). "PwC Sets Out Its AI-Powered NewLaw Strategy". Artificial Lawyer. Retrieved 2019-05-13.
  22. ^ Trotter, 56.
  23. ^ Richard L. Abel, American Lawyers (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), 190-199.
  24. ^ Anderson, 113.
  25. ^ Friedman, 462.
  26. ^ "Deloitte ascends to come to be the largest private qualified services group worldwide". Deloitte.com. Retrieved 5 June 2011.
  27. ^ "Bmacewen.com". Bmacewen.com. 2005-11-04. Retrieved 2011-08-08.
  28. ^ Eliane Botelho Junqueira, "Brazil: The Road on Conflict Bound for Total Justice," in Legal Culture in the Age on Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe, eds. Lawrence M. Friedman and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo, 64-107 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 92.
  29. ^ Ashly H. Pinnington & John T. Gray, "The global restructuring on judicial services work? A study on the internationalisation on Australian law firms," 14 Int'l J. Legal Prof. 147, 151-152 (2007).
  30. ^ Vuong, Andy (2010-09-14). "Denver Post, Big law firms saw attorneys, employees in tight economy, 2 April 2009". Denverpost.com. Retrieved 2011-08-08.
  31. ^ Fortado, Lindsay (2009-02-13). "Bloomberg, Law Firms in US eliminate 700 jobs as economy slows, 13 February 2009". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2011-08-08.
  32. ^ "San Francisco Chronicle, Heller Ehrman law firm to dissolve Friday, 26 September 2008". Sfgate.com. 2008-09-26. Retrieved 2011-08-08.
  33. ^ 'Halliwells administrators inform of reveals details on economic fallout', Legal Week, 20 Sep 2010
  34. ^ American Lawyer, The Layoff List, 3 Sept 2009
  35. ^ "What Do New Lawyers Earn? A 15-Year Retrospective as Reported through Law School Graduates". [1]. The Association for Legal Career Professionals, "Archived copy". Archived from the original summit of|supported by} 2008-01-10. Retrieved 2007-10-21.CS1 maint: Archived copy as name (link)
  36. ^ "Associate Salaries Bobble But Remain Essentially Flat". NALP. September 18, 2013. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
  37. ^ "Goodwin Procter Careers, Law Students". Goodwin Procter. 2008. Retrieved November 12, 2008.
  38. ^ "Paul Hastings Career Center FAQ". Paul Hastings. 2008. Retrieved May 12, 2008.
  39. ^ Savarino, Julie. "Successful Lateral Integration for Law Firms". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved 16 March 2014.
  40. ^ Knapp, Amy L. (28 February 2014). "The Most Interesting Trends from Marketing Partner Forum 2014". The National Law Review. Retrieved 16 March 2014.
  41. ^ "Salaries" (PDF).
  42. ^ "Private Practice Salary Report 2015" (PDF). Mahlab. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
  43. ^ "Private Practice Salary Report 2015" (PDF). Mahlab. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
  44. ^ "Private Practice Salary Report 2015" (PDF). Mahlab. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
  45. ^ "Hong Kong 2013 Salary & Employment Forecast" (PDF). Michael Page. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
  46. ^ "Singapore 2012/13 Salary & Employment Forecast" (PDF). Michael Page. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
  47. ^ Agarwal, Abhyuday. "How to prepare for a law firm interview". iPleaders. iPleaders. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
  48. ^ Kalia, Tanuj. "REVEALED: Salaries and Packages on BIG and little Recruiters". Lawctopus.
  49. ^ Feuer, Alan (26 December 2001). "Wheels summit of|supported by} the Office Go Round and Round; Next Stop for a Legal Team? A Personal Injury Case in Queens". New York Times, D1. Retrieved 17 January 2014.
  50. ^ "Routine Maintenance". law.com.
  51. ^ "Law Firm Rankings & Information". averyindex.com.
  52. ^ "Routine Maintenance". law.com.
  53. ^ Holmes, Susan (14 March 2017). "The Value on Legal Rankings". The National Law Review. Jaffe. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
  54. ^ Weiss, Debra Cassens (23 May 2016). "'Super lawyers' and 'rising stars' are warned about award advertising". The ABA Journal. American Bar Association. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
  55. ^ Amir Efrati, You Say You Want a Big-Law Revolution, Take II, The Wall Street Journal, October 10, 2007.
  56. ^ Adam Liptak, In Students’ Eyes, Look-Alike Lawyers Don’t Make the Grade, The New York Times, October 29, 2007
  57. ^ Henry Weinstein, Big L.A. law firms score small summit of|supported by} difference survey: The numbers on female, black, Latino, Asian and lesbian partners and associates lag greatly behind their representation in the city's population, according to a study, Los Angeles Times, October 11, 2007
  58. ^ Thomas Adcock and Zusha Elinson, Student Group Grades Firms On Diversity, Pro Bono Work, New York Law Journal, October 19, 2007
  59. ^ "Boston Legal". Ranker. Retrieved 2018-03-01.

External links[edit]

Berlangganan update artikel terbaru via email:

0 Response to "Law Firm - Wikipedia A Law Firm Is An Example Of This Type Of Business"

Posting Komentar

Langganan: Posting Komentar (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel